Farage turns on broadcasters over racism allegations as number of claims hits 28

1 hour ago 1

Nigel Farage has turned on broadcasters for questioning him about his alleged teenage racism and antisemitism as the number of school contemporaries who recalled such behaviour to the Guardian reached 28.

In an angry performance at a press conference in London, the Reform leader suggested he would boycott the BBC and said ITV had their own case to answer, as he repeatedly shouted “Bernard Manning”.

Manning, a comedian from Manchester who died in 2007, was a regular face on British television in the 1970s, but he drifted from the public eye after claims that his material was racist and misogynistic.

The intemperate performance by Farage, whose party has slipped in the national polls in recent weeks, came as a further five school contemporaries came forward to the Guardian with allegations that they witnessed deeply offensive racist or antisemitic behaviour by him.

The former Dulwich college pupils said they had been motivated to speak now by the response of Farage and others in his party to an investigation by the Guardian based on multiple accounts of racism.

Reform’s deputy leader, Richard Tice, said on Thursday that all of those who had made the claims were liars.

This included Peter Ettedgui, 61, an Emmy- and Bafta-winning director, who recalled Farage repeatedly growling “Hitler was right”, or “Gas them” at him when they were at school.

However, Nick Hearn, a banker who described himself as “a conservative with a small ‘c’”, told the Guardian he had regularly seen Ettedgui being abused by the now Reform leader, and called on Farage to “come clean”.

Far from being “banter”, as Farage has previously described some of his remarks, Hearn called it “personal (and) vindictive”.

Hearn is the eighth pupil to offer corroboration of Ettedgui’s claims.

He said: “[Farage] was consistent, and he was persistent. Peter and I used to have lunch together in the sort of cloisters, a thoroughfare between the main buildings. There were people going backwards and forwards all the time, and I witnessed on multiple occasions, sort of little snide comments and personal, vindictive, racist comments.

“He had a reputation in school for being a racist. I think he should come clean about his inappropriate behaviour as a young man and apologise.

“People will make up their own opinion, of course, but I just think that it wasn’t idle kids banter. It was targeted and highly racist.”

Mark Bridges, who was in Farage’s year, said he also remembered Farage as “a racist bully”. He said: “I remember Peter Ettedgui, and I remember him being tormented” and targeted by Farage.

The Guardian has previously reported on the claims of Andy Field, an NHS doctor, who said he recalled Farage burning a school roll in a year in which there were more Patels than Smiths.

Richard Flowers came forward to say he also recalled Farage’s response to the number of boys named Patel being higher than Smiths.

He said: “I remember him coming up to us holding the yearbook, which was like a pamphlet, and holding it open and sort of stabbing his finger at the name saying, ‘Look, look, look, the most common name in this school has always been Smith. And now it’s Patel. It’s Patel’ sort of thing and sort of stabbing his finger at it.”

The Guardian has obtained a copy of the school roll for 1980 which shows that there were 12 Smiths and 13 Patels.

A further former pupil of Asian background added his voice, claiming Farage was an open racist and would say “Enoch Powell was right” to him as a form of what he described as “racial intimidation”.

He recalled an assembly held soon before Farage left Dulwich college.

“I remember a full upper school assembly in which the headmaster was reading from a list of names of boys whose parents had failed to return some forms,” he said.

“When the name Patel was read out, Farage shouted out aggressively to draw attention to himself. His intervention was loud and disruptive. The headmaster paused and looked up. This happened again and only with the name Patel. We were sitting in the same row and I saw him do this.” He said this had happened when Farage was 18.

The former pupil said Farage would shout out to draw attention to the name as foreign or not English, and that he appeared “obsessed with Patels”.

A further former pupil, who was in Farage’s year, claimed that while in the final year when Farage was aged 17 or 18, he remembered Farage would make gas hissing noises at a Jewish boy, who was not Ettedgui.

He said: “He would make these gas hissing noises. He had this fascination with Hitler and the whole kind of Third Reich thing. And he had this fascination with basically gassing Jews. And he, as I say, whenever this lad went in to the class, he would make these hissing noises.”

When the Guardian first contacted Reform about allegations made by then a dozen school contemporaries, Farage’s lawyer had claimed that “the suggestion that Mr Farage ever engaged in, condoned, or led racist or antisemitic behaviour is categorically denied”.

He later admitted he may have said things in “banter” at school that could be viewed differently today but denied saying anything racist or antisemitic “directly” at an individual.

On Thursday, Farage denied saying anything racist “with malice” but appeared to lose his temper as questions were asked about the allegations.

Tice had earlier been questioned by the BBC’s Emma Barnett, who pressed the politician on Farage’s “relationship with Hitler”.

Farage said he would no longer speak to the BBC, calling it “despicable” and “beyond belief”.

Describing Barnett as one of the BBC’s “lower-grade presenters”, he criticised the way she asked the question, and then attacked the BBC for the fact it was showing programmes in the 1970s and 1980s that would be viewed as racist today.

Citing television shows including Are You Being Served? and It Ain’t Half Hot Mum, Farage accused the BBC of “double standards and hypocrisy”. He said: “I want an apology from the BBC for virtually everything you did throughout the 1970s and 80s.”

He went on to read out a letter he said he had received from a former schoolmate at Dulwich college, which said that while Farage had been “offensive” he did not recall him as racist.

Farage read: “I was a Jewish pupil at Dulwich college at the same time and I remember him very well. While there was plenty of macho tongue-in-cheek schoolboy banter, it was humour, and yes, sometimes it was offensive … but never with malice. I never heard him racially abuse anyone.

“If he had, he would have been reported and punished. He wasn’t. The news stories are without evidence, except for belatedly, politically dubious recollections from nearly half a century ago. Back in the 1970s the culture was very different … especially at Dulwich. Lots of boys said things they’d regret today or just laugh at. Whilst Nigel stood out, he was neither aggressive nor a racist.”

Pressed on whether the allegations about racist comments were events that really happened, but his classmates experienced them in a different way, Farage said: “Recollections may vary.”

Quick Guide

Contact us about this story

Show

The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know.

If you have something to share on this subject, you can contact us confidentially using the following methods.

Secure Messaging in the Guardian app

The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said.

If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select ‘Secure Messaging’.

SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post

If you can safely use the Tor network without being observed or monitored, you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform.

Finally, our guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us securely, and discusses the pros and cons of each. 

Illustration: Guardian Design / Rich Cousins

Read Entire Article
International | Politik|